Verizon LTE claims Dropping 10M wired homes, 50-75% of territory. Please don't shoot the messenger - I still support DSL. CEO Lowell McAdam intends to shut most copper served homes, 10-15M. This is not because those homes aren't profitable, but they will be even more profitable if served by Verizon's LTE. 

Here's what Lowell told the CITIBANK conference.

"We're moving a lot off of copper onto wireless, as well, especially for voice services and lower speed DSL. And that allows us to have the maintenance savings and gives the customers frankly better service than they would on antiquated copper. So we're doing a number of things to sort of prune the assets down and be a bit more focused."  

This is not news to the industry, which has known for at least two years that AT&T/Verizon intend to strip about half of the U.S. territory of landlines. Washington and most states have put their heads in the sand. The two companies control more than half the U.S.. The FCC continues to plan rural broadband coverage on the assumption they they build. Verizon and AT&T have no intention of expanding to the unserved rural areas even if the government gave them large subsidies.

Both companies offer LTE to 95+% of the U.S. population and both telling D.C. they will go to 97-99%. Verizon CTO Dick Lynch in 2009 explained at the big Barcelona conference their customers demanded nearly complete coverage. He said then VZ would bring LTE to 97-99% of the population. That's even more important today as they hope to sell car connections, which need to work outside of cities. Both companies have massive unused spectrum in rural areas, allowing them to add rural wireless customers at minimal marginal cost.

That still leaves much of the territory (?10-20%, 1-3% population) without wireless or wires. Their LTE solution for about half the territory costs twice as much as the wires they want to abandon. If much of the country is going wireless-only, then we need universal service requirements for wireless. 

Verizon problems per"

Some more from McAdam at Citibank that's interesting.  

"When we went from 3G to 4G, our efficiency of the network went up by 8 times." Verizon is reducing investment in 3G to almost nothing but still has extra capacity on 3G. Customers are switching to 4G very rapidly; 75% of the traffic is on 4G. India and Africa plan to continue investing in 3G, which I believe is a mistake. 4G carries much more per MHz and with higher MIMO that gap will only increase. 4G phones are down to $125 already and headed to $80. The primary chips are down to less than $10 from both Qualcomm and MediaTek. The gap between 3G and 4G phone costs will appproach zero in 12-36 months. 

In the same presentation, McAdam pointed to Verizon's plan to support a bill for Net Neutrality - with a limited definition likely to gut the legislation. 

I think the bright spot here is that the Hill is now starting to circulate some potential legislation. We are not privy to all of the details of it but from what I have heard it is very simple, no throttling, no preferred access to websites, keeping what net neutrality is really meant to be pure and not allowing advocates for a certain financial model to take over the dialogue here. So I'm hopeful that the legislation will become law and we will see some compromise and move this forward because frankly the lack of certainty around this will impact capital deployment in the future and I don't think that the economy can stand that.

Sources: The coverage map above is from Verizon. The 10-20% estimate that they do not want to offer either wired or wireless corresponds roughly to the white areas on the map with no LTE. Verizon and AT&T have carefully not revealed whose service they want to cut. They are trying to get the end of universal service by stealth. 

The second map is problem reports per The red is where they have the most problem reports. This overlaps many of the areas that Verizon claims are served. The company maps and coverage claims cannot be verified and often are in error.








Latest issue

Nov 6 News: Deutsche Wants a Gigabit, Finally Realizes 50 Meg Isn't Enough,1.6 Gig in Sckipio-Calix Test, Reverse Power 4 Port DSLAM for Australia, Australia Makes it Official: to Million Plus, 2 Bonded 212 Lines = 3 Gigabits

*Reply "subscribe" to be added, "un" to be dropped

Angelina Jolie, Ashley Judd and dozens of others have exposed Harvey Weinstein. Every industry, including ours, has monsters like that, rarely stopped.
    I choose instead to highlight some women who are driving us forward. Nicola Palmer and Sanyogita Sangupta lead Verizon’s 5G effort, the most successful in the world. They will spend $billions and have already put hundreds of cells in the field  
     Verizon jumped ahead when almost all others held back. Charla Rath persuaded the FCC to offer gigahertz of mmWave spectrum three years before the official WRC plan. They supported the NYU work to make a more accurate channel model.
     With allies, VZ created their own 5G standard in 2015 because they didn’t want to wait for 3GPP.  The system commercial in 2018 and will do mobile in 2019 if the handsets are ready.  
     “The race is on” between Verizon and AT&T to be first in each market.10%-20% of people almost everywhere hate their broadband provider and likely to switch to mmWave. The U.S. build is going fast because the two giants expect to find a large market replacing landlines outside of their existing region.
     If they are first in a land grab.

Read more ...